### Probability Project

First, we played the game Rock, Paper, Scissors with three players. Every player scored differently, Player A scored if all the players showed the same thing, Player B scored if two of the players showed the same thing, and Player C scored if none of the players showed the same thing. Next, we had to find the theoretical probability which was that Player A won 3/27, Player B won 18/27, and Player C won 6/27 out of 27 games. Then, we found the results of our experiment which were Player A had 2/27 wins, Player B had 17/27 wins, and Player C had 9/27 wins out of 27 games. Next, we found the outcome that occured most was Player B. Then, we found the outcome that occured least was Player A. Next, we found that the experimental probability didn't match the theoretical probability. The differences were that the experimental were off by 1 or 2 numbers and the other was ahead by 1. Last, we found that this game was not fair because Player B has the most chances in winning, Player C has a chance in winning, and Player A has no chances. I think we could change the game by playing it the traditional way, but if two players have the same thing and they beat the other player, then the players face off the traditional way again.

## 10 Comments:

Excellent!

I read over your blog, and i found it inquisitive, you may find My Blog interesting. My blog is just about my day to day life, as a park ranger. So please Click Here To Read My Blog

http://www.juicyfruiter.blogspot.com

hey, I just got a free $500.00 Gift Card. you can redeem yours at Abercrombie & Fitch All you have to do to get yours is Click Here to get a $500 free gift card for your backtoschool wardrobe

Yea I did a similair thing on my blog. www.blog-tutor.com

Check it out

This comment has been removed by the author.

Brian, the probability of you seeing this post is very slim since you haven't posted since May of 2005. It looks like you did well in probability. Your teacher liked your work. Did you find that writing about your work helped you to better understand both the problem and the solution?

I have commented on this project and your blog on http://mhall.edublogs.org

articles seems to be nice,changing background color seems worth visitors, my blog also seems similar to you my blog is www.messages-daily.blogspot.com

1。那混合物是更缓慢的 ... 但是 Lexus 的即将到来混合的版本 ' 将是比气体气体更快的唯一的版本如好地有更多马力。不要自夸速度，但是我被吸引上轮流开车送行为 90，但是警察给我一次休息。

2。那不是很多气 体

将被节省 ... 只是通过在城市乘公交车往返我储蓄过来 $ 5000/yr 与我的以前的汽车，吉普车切诺基相比。超过 5 年，会是 $ 更不用说会进一步增强我的储蓄的最近的比率远足的 20K。这样除非你是在你的父母的地产上吸的一个浪费的儿子，你的声明是一束公牛。

3. 想象我的45 英里的上下班交通操纵（90 r/t）和

45mpg 每天是 2 加仑在我的旧车上>与 8 加>仑相>比。那每天是 6 >加仑的一笔>储蓄， 120 加仑每月， 1440 加仑每年或者 5040 美元（根据 3.5 美元/加仑） ... 加上它发表 1/10th CO2。多愚蠢是它不要骑一个，去算进今天和年龄。

4.缺少了解 ... 是真的，实际上我个人这样那样喜欢它我可能享受所有鼓励；税，合伙用车，免费停车米， prius 业主之间的秘密的信号，等等；这样自私地说那我真地在那里在享受在所有气体汽车业主上的所有权那没有一个想法多少我这辆汽车有的嬉戏。我 junked 我的 SL，郊区对我的 Prius ... 你应该也。

Thank you for sharing.

Oes Tsetnoc | Mengembalikan Jati Diri Bangsa | Kenali dan Kunjungi Objek Wisata di Pandeglang | Oes tsetnoc | Online Marketing | Electronics Gadgets | etips solution | Travel Guide

Post a Comment

<< Home